Skip to content

Column: Canada is not genocidal

For such a genocidal country, we’re a remarkably decent sort, here in Canada.

For such a genocidal country, we’re a remarkably decent sort, here in Canada.

Oh, you might have forgotten that we’re globally tagged as such? And by none other than this country’s own garrulous and gung-ho prime minister, who agreed a while back that Canada is practising on-going genocide in regards to its Indigenous population.

Now, most of us are used to Trudeau’s virtue signaling at every opportunity, even if, by doing so, he glibly besmirches the hard-earned, global reputation of the very country he’s supposed to lead and defend.

But while some of us just rolled our tired eyes on initially hearing this simplistic gutting of the very name Canada – following the exhaustive inquiry and subsequent report into murdered and missing Indigenous women – others across the world likely didn’t understand the true motive behind such a damning accusation, which is polishing Trudeau’s 'woke' image.

So, as to these apparent genocidal tendencies. If that description was even remotely accurate, then it would be strange indeed that nobody has raised much of a fuss about the relatively generous distribution of COVID-19 vaccines to the various northern regions of our country. Or indeed, closer to home in Alberta, the preferential treatment Indigenous folk have received when it comes to a lower age bar to qualify for an accelerated jab.

As of writing, the rate of vaccination in the Yukon stood at 117 jabs delivered per 100 people (it takes two doses, remember), 107 in the Northwest Territories, and 74 in Nunavut. The comparative rate in Alberta, Ontario and Quebec, hovered close to the 45 mark.

That large difference arises because those predominantly Indigenously populated territories were given a relatively large delivery of vaccines as soon as this national immunization program kicked off.

So, if you actually were daft enough to believe this genocide slur, then ask yourself why a country guilty of such an odious practice would be allowing those very people it supposedly wants to eliminate to get a life-saving jab quicker than other Canadians?

Further, has this preferential treatment caused any grim gnashing of teeth, any furious furrowing of badly bothered brows or heartfelt cries of reverse discrimination? Or merely even suggestions to curb this northward flow of life-saving vaccines, so some other area can catch up a tad?

Nope. People have accepted this as the right thing to do. Living North of 60 or on a reserve in Alberta comes with some harsh challenges. Having a pandemic sweep through would multiple those challenges tenfold.

So, despite people fearing their own lives could be in jeopardy, they nevertheless quietly accepted that folks in the North should get preferential treatment. Perhaps they realize that great wild expanse is, at its core, what makes this country different: the bitter winter cold, the amazing Arctic summers and the very people who, for generations, have lived and survived there.

We also remember that those people paid a heavy price with the initial arrival of Europeans who brought with them diseases previously unknown on this continent – diseases for which no vaccines were available.

Today’s reaction in providing early vaccines won’t change history, but it does show that the rest of Canada isn’t filled with insensitive blowhards or – heaven help us – genocidal lunatics.

So perhaps those who are so keen to think the worst of regular people across this great land should stop their endless hectoring for a moment and consider this: we gladly stood aside and said "You first. Your need is greater."

That is the sign of a decent country. And while decency isn’t in vogue so much these days, it nevertheless remains about the finest compliment you can pay to a nation.

push icon
Be the first to read breaking stories. Enable push notifications on your device. Disable anytime.
No thanks